Overall not great performance from these older generations but I was stunned to find the GTX 1070 delivering over 50 fps on average with a 1% low of 46fps.ĪMD's Vega GPUs do fall away a little at the 4K resolution but even so we see Vega 56 matching the GTX 1080, so still an impressive result for the red team. So a pretty weak showing here for the new RTX graphics cards in terms of price vs performance.Īs you might have expected 4K performance, at least with the ultra quality settings is off the table for the GTX 980 Ti and Fury X. Interestingly the 2080 Ti was just 12% faster than the 2080 and less than 20% faster than Vega 64 Liquid and the GTX 1080 Ti. Vega 64 Liquid looks impressive, but truth be told given the price it should always match the GTX 1080 Ti. The Radeon GPUs keep schooling the GeForce competition here, especially Vega 56 given it makes sense in terms of price vs. For around 60 fps on average the GTX 1060 6GB or RX 580 will again be required, while the GTX 1070, 1070 Ti, 1080 or Vega 56 will be needed in order to keep frame rates above 60fps. Anything slower than the GTX 970 is really struggling here and short of the very fastest previous generation cards you will notice regular slowdowns.Īgain we see the graphics cards with only 2GB of VRAM really struggling.
As you can see the GTX 960 and R9 380 are borderline playable, depending on your standards. Moving up to 1440p we've dropped a number of the entry level GPUs as they were simply too slow. We see this across the board, the RX 570 smashed the 3GB GTX 1060 as another example, offering a massive 21% performance boost. Vega 56 also crushed the GTX 1080 and wasn't much slower than the GTX 1080 Ti. Something else you've no doubt noticed is how well the AMD GPUs perform in this title, Vega 64 Liquid for example is still matching the RTX 2080, making it noticeably faster than the GTX 1080 Ti. For 60 fps on average you'll require the GTX 980 or better but for a minimum of 60 fps you'll require the Fury X or GTX 980 Ti, so that's a tall order at just 1080p. The Fury X comes in just behind the GTX 980 Ti while the R9 380 just beat the GTX 960. Both performing more badly usual in this title. Then at the bottom of the graph we find the GT 1030 in both the GDDR5 and DDR4 variants. The 2GB GTX 1050 was also quite a bit slower than the 3GB model. Something interesting here was how much lower the RX 560 2GB was than the 4GB model, basically delivering RX 550-like performance. When looking at the more modern GPUs for 60 fps on average, all gamers require is a GTX 1060 6GB or RX 580, both delivered exceptional performance at 1080p, keeping frame rates above 60 fps at all times. Things look pretty normal here, the GTX 980 looks a little lackluster, getting beaten by pretty much all the mid-range AMD offerings such as the R9 Nano and 390.
#1080p forza horizon 4 image 1080p
For the Radeon GPUs we're using Adrenalin Edition 18.9.3 and for the GeForce GPUs driver version 411.70.įirst up let's take a close look at the 1080p results. Then as a bonus we've re-tested some of the current and previous generation mid-range GPUs along with some older models with the medium quality preset at 1080p.Īlong with a ton of different graphics cards, our test rig is comprised of a Core i7-8700K clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3400 memory. We used the 'Ultra' quality preset at 1080p, 1440p and 4K resolutions. Normally we avoid canned benchmarks but the version provided here is very good and does a great job of representing actual gameplay. For testing we used the game's built-in benchmark.
0 kommentar(er)
